Implantation of iris devices in congenital and traumatic aniridias: Surgery solutions and complications.

PURPOSE To show surgical solutions in patients with traumatic and congenital aniridia, to evaluate the clinical improvement of these patients when iris prosthesis are implanted, and to examine safety and complications of these implants in a long-term follow-up. METHODS Eight patients were included in this retrospective noncomparative case series. Nine eyes had an artificial iris implantation for traumatic or congenital aniridia. Three eyes received a black diaphragm intraocular lens (IOL) in capsular bag after phacoemulsification. An aniridia prosthesis, sulcus sutured, in front of a previous IOL was implanted in two eyes. A black diaphragm IOL, sulcus sutured, in two eyes; two iris diaphragm rings, in front of the previous IOL, in one eye; and a sector iris prosthesis in front of an IOL in the last eye were implanted. Mean follow-up was 22.5 months (range 16 to 44 months). RESULTS All patients had improved visual acuity (VA) and visual comfort after surgery. The glare disability was subjectively better in all cases. Two patients developed new ocular hypertension after surgery; one of them was controlled by medical treatment and the other needed cyclodiode. Two of the patients with glaucoma preoperatively also needed cyclodiode procedure and one of them an Ahmed valve. CONCLUSIONS Several kinds of artificial iris implants are available. In all our patients with aniridia, iris artificial prostheses improved VA and diminished visual discomfort. Glaucoma is the most important complication after artificial iris implant. It is possible to implant the iris prosthesis in the capsular bag, but this requires a large capsulorrhexis and presents a surgical challenge.